after you purchase an all day pass to O'Reilly-World, here's what you get:
BIllO: Are We Dealing With Another Watergate? The testimony is under oath so it's serious.
After saying it can go either two ways, a massive cover-up ala Gordon G. Liddy or a big nothing he adds:
BillO: This has raised all kind of conspiracy theories and now you have Gen.Petraeus added to the mix.
Only the Republicans are throwing down on the conspiracy theroies in hopes to delegitimize Obama. Cut to a clip of McCranky yelling at a reporter.
BIllO: Sen. McCain feels very strongly that there is government malfeasance involved in the Libyan chaos, but that has yet to be proved.
What hasn't...McCain been cranky over? Then Bill begins his Watergate comparison.
BIllO: If the press hadn't been aggressive to this low level break in Nixon would have gotten away with it. And the break in at the Watergate hotel is not nearly as important as defining a terrorist attack that killed four Americans.
Benghazi was just tragic on a massive scale, but it is not in any way shape or form related to the Watergate break in-cover up scandal. Do I really have to lay it all out? Benghazi was a terrorist attack on foreign soil and Richard Nixon had a goon squad called The Plumbers that did illegal activities including going after Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist and to help Nixon win re-election by breaking in and wiretapping the DNC headquarters. And it was deep throat helping Bernstein and Woodward that blew it wide open. What possible motive is there for the WH to lie and then coverup the Benghazi attack? It's never made any sense.
keyboard shortcuts: V vote up article J next comment K previous comment