This would be the oldest plant by far that has ever been grown from ancient tissue. The present record is held by a date palm grown from a seed some 2,000 years old that was recovered from the ancient fortress of Masada in Israel.
Seeds and certain cells can last a long term under the right conditions, but many claims of extreme longevity have failed on closer examination, and biologists are likely to greet this claim, too, with reserve until it can be independently confirmed. Tales of wheat grown from seeds in the tombs of the pharaohs have long been discredited. Lupines were germinated from seeds in a 10,000-year-old lemming burrow found by a gold miner in the Yukon. But the seeds, later dated by the radiocarbon method, turned out to be modern contaminants.
Despite this unpromising background, the new claim is supported by a firm radiocarbon date. A similar avenue of inquiry into the deep past, the field of ancient DNA, was at first discredited after claims of retrieving dinosaur DNA proved erroneous, but with improved methods has produced spectacular results like the reconstitution of the Neanderthal genome.
The new report is by a team led by Svetlana Yashina and David Gilichinsky of the Russian Academy of Sciences research center at Pushchino, near Moscow, and appears in Tuesday’s issue of The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (4)
Eske Willerslev, an expert on ancient DNA at the University of Copenhagen, said the finding was “plausible in principle,” given the conditions in permafrost. But the claim depends on the radiocarbon date being correct: “It’s all resting on that — if there’s something wrong there it can all fall part.”
If the ancient campions are the ancestors of the living plants, this family relationship should be evident in their DNA. Dr. Willerslev said that the Russian researchers should analyze the DNA of their specimens and prove that this is the case. However, this is not easy to do with plants whose genetics are not well studied, Dr. Willerslev said.
If the claim is true, then scientists should be able to study evolution in real time by comparing the ancient and living campions. Possibly other ancient species can be resurrected from the permafrost, including plants that have long been extinct.
- 4 votes
Interesting global climate change does show new light to our earth's past you wonder what else will bloom in the future as our planet warms up.
- 4 votes
Is there a need for concern, or is it just another step in the evolutionary process?
I have heard arguments on both sides of this.
For example, certain foreign species (accidentally or deliberately) introduced into an ecosystem alters the environment in either positive or negative ways (Let's define what is positive or negative, first.):
1. Pythons (purposely or accidentally released) in the Everglades.
2. Killer bees (genetically altered, purposely, but accidentally released) in Brazil.
3. The Japanese Beetle in North America.
Others argue that these are just other steps in the overall evolutionary processes of the earth's ecosystems.
A resurrection of extinct species may have a similar effect on the ecosystem into which it is released.
What's more, a re-awakened extinct species could also re-awaken diseases that it carried.
Is this really cause for concern?
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



