Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Carloz's column >>

CARLOZ

Home Page
Welcome / Bienvenido
Articles Posted: 508  Links Seeded: 8141
Member Since: 8/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

John Boehner: Obama Administration's 'Attack on Religious Freedom Will Not Stand' (Video)

Wed Feb 8, 2012 4:20 PM EST
politics, us, health-care, barack-obama, republicans, gop, congress, republican, usa, youtube, womens-health, health-care-reform, obama-administration, john-boehner, house-of-representatives, 2012-elections, birth-control, contraception, transcripts, affordable-care-act, speeches, hcr, dominionism, freedom-of-religion, church-and-state, speaker-of-the-house, morning-after-pill, video-clips, insurance-industry, health-and-human-services, affordable-care-and-patient-protection-act, acppa
By Carloz
Advertise | AdChoices

Speaker Boehner: House Will Act to Reverse Obama Administration Attack on Religious Freedom

Washington (Feb 8)

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) made the following statement on the House floor today:

Transcript:

“In recent days, Americans of every faith and political persuasion have mobilized in objection to a rule put forward by the Obama Administration that constitutes an unambiguous attack on religious freedom in our country. 

“This rule would require faith-based employers – including Catholic charities, schools, universities, and hospitals – to provide services they believe are immoral.  Those services include sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs and devices, and contraception. 

“In imposing this requirement, the federal government has drifted dangerously beyond its constitutional boundaries, encroaching on religious freedom in a manner that affects millions of Americans and harms some of our nation’s most vital institutions.

“If the president does not reverse the Department’s attack on religious freedom, then the Congress, acting on behalf of the American people and the Constitution we are sworn to uphold and defend, must. 

“The House will approach this matter fairly and deliberately, through regular order and the appropriate legislative channels. 

“Because it has primary jurisdiction on the issues involved, the Energy & Commerce Committee is taking the lead on the legislative process that will be necessary to enact an effective and appropriate solution.  Chairman Upton convened a hearing last year and began laying the groundwork for legislative action when this flawed rule was first proposed.  I welcome his efforts to consider all possible options as his committee proceeds with its work. 

“This attack by the federal government on religious freedom in our country must not stand, and will not stand.”

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Carloz's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 112th Congress: Keeping tabs, 112th United States Congress, 2012 US Elections, Abortion is Pro-Life, American Progressives, American_Politics, cheapdirtystuntsbyGOPfascists, DemGuys, Democrats, Divorcing church and state, Election 2012, Elephant POOP!, Extreme Liberal Democrats, Femvine, FIRED UP DEMOCRATS!, Free Thinkers, GOP Watch , GOP's War On Women, Grounded for Life, Gut Check America, Health Care Policy, Heated Debate, Left of Center, Newsvine HONOR Vine, Nightly News (Old), Obama Supporters, Open Minded, Open Minded People of Faith, Outing Dominionism, Political Analysis, Politics in USA, Progressive American Rights, Proud Liberal and Progressive, Rational Progressive Party, Religious Liberals, Religious Right Watch, RepubliCON Watch, RightsVine, Seeders and Posters w/ Manners, Soapbox, The 2012 Elections, The Vine 12 Step, Theocratic Life, Tin Foil Hats, US News and Views , Video & Music Links, Whores and Sluts
  • Regions: United States , Dayton, Cincinnati, Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (21)
Carloz

Boehner is playing to the tune of the religious Right by following in the footsteps of the GOP's presidential hopefuls and launching the latest salvo against Obama. It's obviously an all out attack as they flail around looking for something that will motivate their discouraged base. Of course, Republican elected officials have been paying more attention to culture war issues like this than the economy and jobs for the past few years anyway, but as the economy continues to gets better, expect to hear louder and louder noise on issues like this from the Republican party as election day approaches.

  • 10 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 4:30 PM EST
ambivalent

OMG! He sounds drunk!

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 4:35 PM EST
SW Missouri Mule

He always sounds drunk and looks drunk. I think that's where his ideas come from.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 5:33 PM EST
ambivalent

He is slurring over his own (presumably) words. He needs a one way ticket back home.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 5:34 PM EST
David Boddie

They don't want their rights violated, but are willing to push our rights out of the way.

  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 5:46 PM EST
Carloz

And Republicans in the Senate are making their move, too.

Senate GOP Discussing Legislative Response to Obama’s Contraception Mandate

“This is unprecedented. This is not a women’s rights issue,” Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., said, along with other Repubican leaders, at a press conference today. “This is a religious rights issue. This is a religious liberty issue.”

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said the decision amounted to a “trampling of the First Amendment” and a “systematic dismantling of religious liberty for people in this country.

“It’s pretty clear to me that the growth and expansion we’ve seen in government is leading us more toward a social welfare state that you would see in an European country,” said Thune. “And I think decisions like this are also decisions that move us more in the direction of the secularization of our country and seem to me to suggest a disregard for the basic, core beliefs of a lot of the American people.”

  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:17 PM EST
Arieus

John Boehner: Obama Administration's 'Attack on Religious Freedom Will Not Stand' (Video)

BS! Religious people have stolen the people's rights and I for one would like for all these religious azzwipes to keep their beliefs to themselves, and stop pushing them on to everyone else that wants nothing to do with these evil and insane people that pray to an invisible man in the sky.

I can see an all pout Holy War in America happening, because I for one an sick and tired of religious people stealing my right to think for myself and stealing away our freedoms as they try and enforce their moral bs onto the rest of us.

Pay your fair share of god-damn taxes all you freaking thieving charlatans.

And if you don't like my post, go an pray to your invisible man about it. I'll send you my address for it to show up and we will discuss it over some honey biscuits and tea.

  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:06 PM EST
SW Missouri Mule

WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:

Stand Strong in Support of New No-Cost Birth Control Policy

Thanks to the Obama administration, nearly all women will soon have access to birth-control coverage at no cost. It’s a huge victory for our country, where 99 percent of women use birth control at some point in their lives.

In developing this policy that will significantly improve women’s health, the Obama administration resisted a pressure campaign from anti-contraception groups. These groups wanted to allowed many employers, including universities and hospitals, to refuse to cover birth control.

Unfortunately, those anti-contraception groups continue to call on the White House to rescind its policy.

It’s up to pro-choice Americans to speak up for birth-control coverage. Sign your name to let the administration know that you are with them 100 percent.

Petition to "Stand Strong in Support of New No Cost Birth Control Policy"

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:34 PM EST
Carloz

Thanks for the petition link, SWMM!

  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:57 PM EST
Reply
don-72

Sorry John as long as women do not all have the same rights to health care because some religion is apposed to providing care that they may want then you are wrong and so is that religion........

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 4:58 PM EST
fredegrar

If this is as "unambiguous an attack on religious freedom" as the Speaker claims, then surely the federal courts would agree and come down in favor of institutions challenging the rule in court. No legislative action required. So, either it's not as "unambiguous" as the Speaker would like us to think (and he knows it), or he's just using the issue as a convenient political cudgel, or both. As if we didn't already know.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 5:32 PM EST
ryoushi12

It is NOT. The Catholic church has ALREADY lost this battle in the courts, when it was ORDERED to consider same sex couples for adoption, IF the church wanted to get federal tax dollars to support its adoption agancies. The church responded by either shutting down adoptin agencies or removing itself from running them.

Since the church KNOWS it WILL lose this battle in the courts, it is attempting to subvert the system POLITICALLY instead.

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:06 PM EST
Reply
Carol-500283

Boner, start working on JOB creation will ya??? That was your big election stand last time you got all the Tpubs, now where to h--- are they????????? Oh yeah, you're all busy telling the rest of us what and how to practice religion. STAY OUT OF THE BEDROOM will you?? I hope the voters hand you all your @$$ this Nov. Bye!

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:07 PM EST
Brite

As I said on another seed...

If these people don't want to offer comprehensive health care to include family planning to their employees who are not of their religion then:

  1. They need to hire ONLY true believers of their religion
  2. They need to hire ONLY men (because apparently, having a uterus is a "pre existing condition")
  3. They need to quite taking any and ALL federally money
  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:08 PM EST
ryoushi12

Exactly, it needs to stated LOUD and CLEAR that the republicans SUPPORT the catholic church IMPOSING ITS BELIEFS on it NON-catholic workers.

  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:08 PM EST
Reply
Hoopla



Many people recognize that the Catholic church does a lot of outreach to the community, giving aid and assistance to people of all faiths and persuasions. In the spirit of Christianity, nothing should necessarily be expected in return for giving and helping others.

In the case of large institutions such as hospitals in particular, the reach can be far and wide in such way that it can be considered that government bodies may be able to set certain parameters. Take Corporations, for example: No one can just go out there and form a corporation, if I understand correctly. A government body issues a charter. Should any private entity such as a church have the right to construct an institution that delivers emergency services without having to operate under certain standards and guidelines. Afterall, once a hospital is established in an area or region, that institution becomes point of service for all people in the community. Once a hospital is established, why should people have to make life or death decisions based on the fact that the closest medical facility may not delivered care that is legal and medically accepted. That does not just speak to abortion services, that may emcompass care governed by advance directives or even the refusal of certain types of care and services.

Would a large Catholic institution such as a hospital or University have to restrict employment to Catholics only in order to make job-relted health benefits to conform to religious beliefs? I think that is what it would have to come to - restricted access to employment.

I say to Catholics who are entitled to the right to practice their religion without interference from the government: Close your hospitals, Close your institutions and pull back from the community at large into the confines of your places of worship

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:47 PM EST
SW Missouri Mule

Wouldn't that put a hurt in their stairway to heaven.

  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:38 PM EST
Reply
Joanna Caroll

Political and religious bullies have to be put on alert...again. It's never ending.

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:54 PM EST
ScienceGuy-356641

Traditional family values according to sanctimonious, Bible-beating, chest-thumping conservative pundits and politicians: unplanned pregnancies by unwed teenaged girls.

  • 1 vote
Reply#8 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 9:22 PM EST
tweetheart44

This is what I don't understand. If Catholics don't want to use these services, no one is forcing them to use them. If Catholics are such "perfect Catholics", why would they even want to get contraceptives or sterilization? If Catholics think that contraceptives and abortion are so terrible, is the Catholic Church willing to take in all unwanted children that are born as a result of banning contraception and abortion? It is obvious that the answer to that question is NO.

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 1:51 AM EST
Brite

What I find tellling is that 98% of sexually active Catholic women have used contraception... but let's not let them have access to it.... Or any one else...

  • 4 votes
Reply#10 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 2:15 AM EST
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com