With salt under attack for its ill effects on the nation's health, the food giant Cargill kicked off a campaign last November to spread its own message.
"Salt is a pretty amazing compound," Alton Brown, a Food Network star, gushes in a Cargill video called Salt 101. "So make sure you have plenty of salt in your kitchen at all times."
The campaign by Cargill, which both produces and uses salt, promotes salt as "life enhancing" and suggests sprinkling it on foods as varied as chocolate cookies, fresh fruit, ice cream and even coffee. "You might be surprised," Mr. Brown says, "by what foods are enhanced by its briny kiss."
By all appearances, this is a moment of reckoning for salt. High blood pressure is rising among adults and children. Government health experts estimate that deep cuts in salt consumption could save 150,000 lives a year.
Since processed foods account for most of the salt in the American diet, national health officials, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York and Michelle Obama are urging food companies to greatly reduce their use of salt. Last month, the Institute of Medicine went further, urging the government to force companies to do so.
But the industry is working overtly and behind the scenes to fend off these attacks, using a shifting set of tactics that have defeated similar efforts for 30 years, records and interviews show. Industry insiders call the strategy "delay and divert" and say companies have a powerful incentive to fight back: they crave salt as a low-cost way to create tastes and textures. Doing without it risks losing customers, and replacing it with more expensive ingredients risks losing profits.
When health advocates first petitioned the federal government to regulate salt in 1978, food companies sponsored research aimed at casting doubt on the link between salt and hypertension. Two decades later, when federal officials tried to cut the salt in products labeled "healthy," companies argued that foods already low in sugar and fat would not sell with less salt.
Now, the industry is blaming consumers for resisting efforts to reduce salt in all foods, pointing to, as Kellogg put it in a letter to a federal nutrition advisory committee, "the virtually intractable nature of the appetite for salt."
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (4)
Salt started out more than 5,000 years ago as a simple preservative. But salt and dozens of compounds containing sodium — the element in salt linked to hypertension — have become omnipresent in processed foods from one end of the grocery store to the other.
[...]
Food companies say that reducing salt by 10 percent or so is easy, but that going further is difficult.
- 1 vote
I'm kinda torn on this issue. I'm a saltaholic, to a degree; don't have high blood pressure; and generally add salt to what I eat (except for sweets; really, salt on my cereal? Gimme a break!).
Salt is a preservative; but how much of a preservative is needed if the processed foods are flash-frozen or canned properly (canned goods are, even by my standards, wayyyyyyy too salty)?
I do think processed foods might do well to rely on other spices for flavor, thereby negating the need for so much salt. The consumer is always free to add salt to taste after the fact. Who doesn't have a saltshaker in their kitchen? Or can't get one? But more than the salt issue is that of other, unpronounceable ingredients, that we regularly see on labels. Some of these ingredients we are beginning to get wise to: high-fructose corn syrup, for one. I read labels, and if I see that one ingredient, I don't buy the product. If sugar is required, use real sugar, for Pete's sake. What I don't understand is the use of sugar in some recipes that are not considered "sweet." Spaghetti sauce, for one thing. There are others... and there are other spices that would add a lot of flavor with less of a health risk and whose names can be pronounced, too.
One thing about salt, though, that no one mentions: it is a requirement for life. Some salt is required just to keep the ol' body running... a deficiency would be as lethal as too much of the stuff. So, as with most things, moderation is key.
- 2 votes
I'm kinda torn on this issue.
I am, too, although I stopped adding salt when I cook and eat a long, long time ago -- I don't miss it at all. However, I know I get what I need from what's added by manufacturers.
- 2 votes
Our bodies need the iodine we get from salt, but too much of anything is always bad. I really try to watch the salt when I'm cooking and I read labels when I'm shopping for groceries.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



